The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The article reads like a CV. Notability is not established. Citation sources are not notable (his university and related websites). The only links from other articles come from their Further Reading sections, all for the same book.
Labalius (
talk) 02:21, 25 June 2015 (UTC)reply
Speedy keep. Nominator has clearly not paid any attention to
WP:PROF and has provided a faulty nomination statement — Incoming links and quality of sourcing are not notability criteria. Subject passes crieteria #C1 (highly cited publications
[1] in a low-citation field), #C3 (fellow of INFORMS), and #C5 (named chair at an R1 university). Any one of these would be enough. —
David Eppstein (
talk) 05:22, 25 June 2015 (UTC)reply
Keep. Holder of a named chair at a major university. --
Necrothesp (
talk) 13:42, 1 July 2015 (UTC)reply
Speedy Keep. Yes, I think it would be good form for the nom to withdraw. This one is just wasting editors' valuable time.
Agricola44 (
talk) 19:41, 1 July 2015 (UTC).reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.