The result was delete. Cirt ( talk) 03:24, 23 April 2009 (UTC) reply
Hoax/neologism/nonsense/non-notable/original research? I'm neutral for now, I'm listing to generate discussion. Headbomb { ταλκ κοντριβς – WP Physics} 21:11, 16 April 2009 (UTC) reply
I would like to take this moment to step in and defend this article. Your reaction towards the article "joke theory" is exactly as I had hypothesized. You see, I am a very renowned Psychologist, Dr. Jenkins, and my colleagues at the City University of New York and I have began to hypothesize on the effects of Jokes on the minds of people. Your response models the concept of "joke suppresions: When one group or groups of people fail to see humor in a Joke, then they will do all in their power to Suppress and/or eliminate the Joke. My Colleagues and I are planning on publishing a Thesis concerning the effects of Jokes on human minds, and we will soon release it, entitled Joke Theory: Human's Perspective with Regard to Humor. So, with regard to my research, I would very much appreciate it if you were to keep this article, as it will allow for our studies to go beyond just those in the Lab. Thank you kindly. —Preceding unsigned comment added by IoIwut101 ( talk • contribs) 22:06, 20 April 2009 (UTC) reply
Also: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_J._Jenkins —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.78.78.19 ( talk) 22:09, 20 April 2009 (UTC) reply