The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep.
RL0919 (
talk) 21:30, 2 December 2023 (UTC)reply
Keep. There does seem to be adequate coverage in English in Google Books, and there also look to be multiple sources in the ja article.
Espresso Addict (
talk) 02:23, 27 November 2023 (UTC)reply
Keep - There is coverage in Japanese, which counts towards notability per
WP:GLOBAL &
WP:NONENG. Would be nice if
WP:BEFORE had been followed here.
DCsansei (
talk) 13:47, 27 November 2023 (UTC)reply
Keep - I added three citations, including coverage in Japanese press fround through ProQuest International.
MrSpartan456 (
talk) 01:53, 30 November 2023 (UTC)reply
Keep appears to be a notable indiviual and passes
WP:GNG.
Powerviki (
talk) 15:20, 2 December 2023 (UTC)reply
Keep per coverage founded above in Japanese.
Antimargi (
talk) 16:40, 2 December 2023 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.