The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sandstein 06:39, 15 April 2018 (UTC)reply
This article is nothing but an ad for Mr. Two-Hawks and all "controversial items" have been removed by his agent multiple times and will likely be removed again. see talk page and history
NWWT (
talk) 00:41, 31 March 2018 (UTC)reply
Comment - Can you provide diffs where the material is removed? Also, does this breach
WP:BLP? I'm not sure how I'd !vote, but I agree that it would be better to come to a consensus this time around.
Smmurphy(
Talk) 02:37, 31 March 2018 (UTC)reply
Keep as he passes
WP:NMUSIC category 8 as he was nominated for a Grammy Award for his album Wind Songs as confirmed by a reliable source
here. If his agent is causing problems he should be reported at
WP:COIN and will most probably be blocked.
Atlantic306 (
talk) 18:38, 3 April 2018 (UTC)reply
CommentDelete working on this article over the years, my opinion is that the subject is not notable. Much puffery appears to have been added by the subject or their partner/agent, and then been removed. There has also been sockpuppetry in this area. Initially there was unearned notability because sourcing for a whole other individual, of the same name, was erroneously included. Much of the publications and videos seem self-published, and many of the appearances seem to be trade show promotional gigs or the like. So much of what has been added has been COI that it's been hard to sort through. The only reason to keep would be to disambig this person from similarly-named individuals, and to keep some of the fact-checking intact in that area; but that is not actually the purpose of the 'pedia. If we are going on pure notability, and keeping the content on the pedia honest, I lean towards delete. -
CorbieV☊☼ 21:49, 5 April 2018 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Spirit of Eagle (
talk) 04:09, 7 April 2018 (UTC)reply
Delete - the only independent reference that is not just a music directory is a relatively small paper. Insufficient to support
WP:MUSICBIO criteria.--
Rpclod (
talk) 18:25, 7 April 2018 (UTC)reply
Comment - I've changed to delete. Looking over the recent deletions and additions, I see the content about the hoaxes perpetrated by this individual have been deleted by his manager, and stayed deleted. The hoaxes were actually better-known than his other work, as far as I could tell. The recently-added source that confirms his birth name also has errors, like his false claims of Native heritage, so, while useful for the name, it also adds false info to the 'pedia. This is just too full of misinformation to allow on the 'pedia, and always will be. It needs to go. -
CorbieV☊☼ 22:51, 7 April 2018 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.