From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) J 947 04:32, 2 March 2017 (UTC) reply

John Morgan (lawyer)

John Morgan (lawyer) (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Less an actual biography than a legal-services directory entry. Not seeing much actual biography nor any really good reason for one. Calton | Talk 03:06, 16 February 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 23:11, 19 February 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Keep per Morgan's notable involvement with 2014 (see article) and 2016 medical marijuana initiatives. The Florida press has often highlighted his strong backing of Amendment 2, which passed last November with over 70% of the vote. Stevie is the man! TalkWork 19:45, 22 February 2017 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — MRD2014 📞 What I've done 03:56, 23 February 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Strong Keep Ubiquitously well-known lawyer in Florida and the Southeast, one of the (if not the) largest Democratic donors in the state, the chief supporter of the successful marijuana legalization referendum not six months ago, and the current prohibitive front-runner for the Democratic nomination for governor in one year. Absolutely ridiculous to call him "non-notable". Could the article be better written? Totally. Should it be deleted? No. Therequiembellishere ( talk) 08:28, 23 February 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Keep per above. MB298 ( talk) 09:54, 25 February 2017 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.