The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Cirt (
talk) 00:13, 3 February 2010 (UTC)reply
Delete. Unsourced BLP which lacks non-trivial coverage from reliable third party publications.
JBsupreme (
talk) 07:59, 27 January 2010 (UTC)reply
Delete A perfectly run-of-the-mill illustrator, with no significant independent coverage that I can find, though there are a moderate number of hits to his own web site, sites that plug his work, sites where his work is published, etc. Article gives no sources.
JamesBWatson (
talk) 08:26, 27 January 2010 (UTC)reply
Delete The only hits are to the artist's own website or on supporters' websites, no third-part independent coverage can be identified.
McMarcoP (
talk) 12:46, 27 January 2010 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.