From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Randykitty ( talk) 14:20, 7 November 2014 (UTC) reply

John Chapman (Massachusetts)

John Chapman (Massachusetts) (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Per Wikipedia:BLP1E and Wikipedia:POLITICIAN. Unelected political candidate who has been covered only in the context of a single event (2014 election) Hirolovesswords ( talk) 12:42, 31 October 2014 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 13:58, 31 October 2014 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 13:58, 31 October 2014 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 14:10, 31 October 2014 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 14:10, 31 October 2014 (UTC) reply
  • Delete Candidate for office, lacking significant coverage in reliable sources. Tiller54 ( talk) 15:53, 31 October 2014 (UTC) reply
  • Delete per WP:POLITICIAN (not per BLP1E) if he loses the U.S. congressional election next Tuesday. At this late stage, I suggest further AFDs for non-incumbent candidates in this election be withheld until after Nov. 4, because the discussions won't likely be closed before then and it's better to start a deletion nomination with a clear result. postdlf ( talk) 16:17, 31 October 2014 (UTC) reply
  • Delete -- fat chance he'll win in P'town. Bearian ( talk) 22:45, 3 November 2014 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.