- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Biblio worm 19:28, 26 December 2015 (UTC)
John Balfour, 5th of Balbirnie
- John Balfour, 5th of Balbirnie ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:GNG. Being "a gentleman" and having arguably notable offspring is not sufficient. Mutt Lunker ( talk) 20:17, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
- Delete His father and one of his sons were Members of Parliament and therefore notable. Another of his sons was a general and therefore notable. Notability is not inherited, either up or down the family tree. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 21:26, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
- Comment Perhaps the article can benefit from further revision Arashtitan talk 20 December 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. He doesn't seem to have accomplished much, so unless he made a cameo appearance in the latest Star Wars movie, further revision would be like rearranging the deck chairs on the Titanic. Clarityfiend ( talk) 01:17, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Scotland-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp ( talk) 09:56, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
- Delete as fails WP:Notability (people). The only mentions of him I found were in peerage directories (Debrett's, Burke's) or as someone's relative. WP:NOTDIRECTORY & WP:NOTGENEALOGY. -- Bejnar ( talk) 19:16, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.