- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy keep per WP:SK#1. Nomination withdrawn with no outstanding delete !votes. ( Non-administrator closure.) NorthAmerica 1000 00:58, 12 June 2014 (UTC)
John Bacon (clerk)
- John Bacon (clerk) ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
non-notable clerk 75 * 00:23, 11 June 2014 (UTC)
- Keep A member of the forerunner to the Royal Society of Arts, published author, temple clerk and featured in the Dictionary of National Biography certainly push him beyond the notability guideline. Four references added to the slightly expanded/cleaned up article. Philg88 ♦ talk 05:24, 11 June 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 00:26, 11 June 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 00:26, 11 June 2014 (UTC)
- Speedy keep Inclusion in the DNB alone is generally considered proof of notability. User:Sɛvɪnti faɪv, did you look for additional sources to meet WP:GNG WP:BEFORE nominating an article for deletion? Boleyn ( talk) 09:49, 11 June 2014 (UTC)
- Speedy Keep. Inclusion in the DNB, which has far more stringent entry criteria than Wikipedia, is perfectly sufficient. -- Necrothesp ( talk) 12:26, 11 June 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.