- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Kurykh ( talk) 01:05, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
John Andrew Morrow
- John Andrew Morrow ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I do not see how this person passes GNG or PROF. The article is borderline spam, and the publications are--well, look for yourself: Cambridge Scholars, Edwin Mellen, McFarland & Sons (no disrespect intended), all without further evidence that this person has made an impact in his field. Drmies ( talk) 03:15, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Jbh Talk 03:17, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Jbh Talk 03:17, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
- Delete No indication he meets PROF. Only one of his works has been cited more than ten times [1] (Since is registered and verified we can be pretty sure that the publication list is up to date) The article itself reads like a resume. Jbh Talk 03:21, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
- Delete The sources tend towards blogs and other weak, non-reliable sources. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 17:33, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.