- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. As per WP:SNOW. ( non-admin closure) Esquivalience t 01:10, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
John Albeni (bishop)
- John Albeni (bishop) ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Insufficient context/notability. JustBerry ( talk) 03:00, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
- Keep. Catholic bishops are usually considered notable. This one certainly is, having attracted coverage in a number of encyclopedias, including the Pécs Lexikon and the Magyar Katolikus Lexikon. Some further print sources not already used as references in the article are listed on a Albeni János page on the website of the Győző Csorba County and Municipal Library. — Psychonaut ( talk) 06:48, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
- Keep. In time, the stub could be developed into an article. Borsoka ( talk) 11:09, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
- Keep. As per Borsoka and Psychonaut.-- Rovibroni ( talk) 13:52, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hungary-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 14:05, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 14:05, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 14:05, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
- Keep. When dealing with possible WP:GNG issues, some latitude should be given to historical figures. GregorB ( talk) 14:19, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
- Keep. Catholic bishops are always considered to be notable. -- Necrothesp ( talk) 15:01, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
- Keep per WP:CLERGY. JustBerry, would you consider withfrawing the nomination based on all the comments? Boleyn ( talk) 08:57, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
- Keep User:JustBerry, Some categories: athletes who win major competitions or place at the Olympics, Bishops, Princes regnant ( Henry of Isenburg-Covern), Members of the House of Lords, in which individuals get kept automatically. There are quite a number of such categories. You have, in a scan of only the first 50 entries on you recent edits page, nominated individuals in each of the categories I mention for deletion. Please slow down, starting AFDs in such long-standing, automatic-keep categories is not a useful contribution. E.M.Gregory ( talk) 18:18, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
- Close User:JustBerry appears to edit very intermittently, Someone should simply close this and other recent User:JustBerry AFDs that are obvious keeps. E.M.Gregory ( talk) 18:22, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.