The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Keep. NAC.
Schuym1 (
talk) 22:18, 1 December 2008 (UTC)reply
A non-notable singer.
Schuym1 (
talk) 14:38, 27 November 2008 (UTC)reply
Speedy Delete. Had one appearance in the charts, at #76... that doesn't assert even a shred of notability. Most likely written by a fan.
TopGearFreak 15:37, 27 November 2008 (UTC)reply
Speedy/Snow Delete 1 hit at Number 76? Not remotely notable. --
Numyht (
talk) 16:57, 27 November 2008 (UTC)reply
At
WP:MUSICBIO, requirement #2 says "Has had a charted hit on any national music chart." I think he would pass that, if we can get that verified. So my vote would be Keep if that can be verified, but if not Delete.
Followup, I did find him mentioned in a reliable source, found
here, which may be enough to meet requirement #1 as well. Tavix(talk) 17:03, 27 November 2008 (UTC)reply
Keep. The Billboard website
confirms that the song charted, so it meets criteria #2 of
WP:MUSIC. Combined with the other sources mentioned, there should be enough for a very short article.
BradV 20:46, 27 November 2008 (UTC)reply
Keep. The MUSIC criteria don't say how high a song, single or album should chart, just that it should make the chart, which it did.-
Mgm|
(talk) 22:23, 27 November 2008 (UTC)reply
Keep, meets
WP:MUSIC#C2. Criteria makes no mention of how high up a chart you need to be, just that it has charted. Billboard reference
confirms, notability established.
Esradekan Gibb "Talk" 04:14, 28 November 2008 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.