The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sandstein 21:22, 20 January 2018 (UTC)reply
Dearth of
substantial and in-depth, dedicated
reliable sources. Only primary/affiliated refs and brief mentions. No worthwhile redirect targets. czar 16:02, 13 January 2018 (UTC)reply
Delete for lack of
WP:SIGCOV in reliable, independent sources.
E.M.Gregory (
talk) 17:32, 18 January 2018 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.