The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete.
✗plicit 00:13, 23 May 2021 (UTC)reply
Hedge fund executive businessman does not meet
WP:NBIO. Lots of sources, but none of the roles establish notability.
MrsSnoozyTurtle (
talk) 16:08, 8 May 2021 (UTC)reply
Joe Lonsdale has founded several multibillion dollar companies, profiled by Forbes, Business Insider, WSJ, etc. Clearly meets
WP:NBIO. Given your persistent attempts to delete this article under different rationals, you likely have a COI and should recuse yourself from the discussion under
WP:COI— Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Portola2018 (
talk
Vote for no deletion. Joe Lonsdale is discussed frequently as a major entrepreneur and investor in noteworthy publications (including those cited). He is
WP:NBIONavigator1492 21:48, 10 May 2021 (UTC)reply
This page should not be deleted. Joe Lonsdale is a notable investor and entrepreneur. His inclusion in Forbes' Midas list 5 years in a row, including being the youngest member to achieve this title in 2016, clearly places him in a position of notoriety under
WP:ANYBIO --
Bugmango (
talk) 13:58, 11 May 2021 (UTC)reply
This page should not be deleted. A simple google news search returns thousands of hits from notable third party sources where Joe Lonsdale is either quoted or written about. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Buckeye442 (
talk •
contribs) 16:57, 11 May 2021 (UTC)reply
Delete - undisclosed paid-for spam. If you were in doubt as to whether this is a bad-faith article, see the sock/meatpuppetry above. Behavior like this must not be rewarded.
MER-C 18:50, 13 May 2021 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Missvain (
talk) 02:13, 16 May 2021 (UTC)reply
Delete "trivial coverage of a subject by secondary sources may not be sufficient to establish notability." Best
Alexandermcnabb (
talk) 09:22, 16 May 2021 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.