The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Delete - Nothing to suggest notability from a web search (appreciate that not all sources for things can be found online, but if there is nothing standing out about a living person then it's a fair presumption that there's not a fat lot offline). Article appears to have been created with a COI anyway.
Jeni(
talk) 17:32, 14 December 2015 (UTC)reply
Mayors of places this size can meet
WP:NPOL #3 if they can be substanced and sourced well enough to pass
WP:GNG — but a city has to be considerably larger than 28K before a mayor gets an automatic presumption of notability just for existing. But the sourcing here isn't adequate, and there's no substantive content here beyond "he exists, he went to high school, he started a business, he became mayor, the end" — the substance necessary to get a mayor into Wikipedia would involve writing and sourcing content about things he did as the mayor, not unsourced background information about his personal life. Delete.
Bearcat (
talk) 18:19, 17 December 2015 (UTC)reply
Delete Mayor of city of under 30,000 without other references to demonstrate notability.
John Pack Lambert (
talk) 19:03, 19 December 2015 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.