From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 02:11, 29 April 2018 (UTC) reply

Jobs in newspapers

Jobs in newspapers (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There is already an article on Classifieds, which are standard in all countries and their newspapers. Also contains generic statements on classifieds of different publications and read like POV and OR. MT Train Talk 10:54, 21 April 2018 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. MT Train Talk 10:54, 21 April 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. MT Train Talk 10:54, 21 April 2018 (UTC) reply
Delete. Fails Wikipedia:No original research. User:Tetizeraz. Send me a ✉️ ! 13:39, 21 April 2018 (UTC) reply
  • Delete. The article's restriction to one country is either a ludicrously major failure of WP:UNDUE or else the article is misnamed. If the latter, the article needs to explain why job advertising in Pakistan is so notably different from the rest of the world that it needs a standalone article. Spinning Spark 15:54, 21 April 2018 (UTC) reply
  • Delete - this article reads too much like an advertisement to have a place in Wikipedia. Vorbee ( talk) 17:05, 21 April 2018 (UTC) reply
  • Doesn't seem like an encyclopedic entry with such title. I'll go with delete.  M A A Z   T A L K  04:01, 22 April 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 13:20, 22 April 2018 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.