The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete.
Mz7 (
talk) 04:38, 26 August 2017 (UTC)reply
This page seems to have been created in relation to her role as a failed political candidate, which doesn't confer notability. Her business roles and her past as a chief of staff for a state government minister are also not notable.
Grahame (
talk) 03:20, 18 August 2017 (UTC)reply
Delete. People do not get articles just for being candidates in elections that they didn't win — to satisfy
WP:NPOL, she has to win the election and thereby hold office, not just run and lose. But there's no supplementary evidence of notability for other reasons being shown here at all — the content about her prior career in business is referenced entirely to
primary sources, not
reliable ones, and she isn't the subject of the source for being chief of staff to Greg Pearce, but merely has her existence namechecked in an article whose subject is Pearce. That's not a source that assists notability for that position at all — so we're ultimately right back to "notable because she ran for the state legislature and lost", which no, she's not.
Bearcat (
talk) 18:26, 19 August 2017 (UTC)reply
Delete. Pretty cut and dried. Bearcat says it all above.
Frickeg (
talk) 10:45, 21 August 2017 (UTC)reply
Delete, I endorse Bearcat's sound reasoning above.
Lankiveil(
speak to me) 00:41, 22 August 2017 (UTC).reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.