From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. I will invoke WP:IAR and say WP:SOFTDELETE applies here if worthwhile sources do show up and are found sufficient. Kurykh ( talk) 02:08, 1 March 2017 (UTC) reply

Jithani (2017 TV series)

Jithani (2017 TV series) (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No references to assert notability, one sentence article CatcherStorm talk 21:05, 5 February 2017 (UTC) reply

  • Delete If this entry is one sentence long and not been updated, I think this article could go. TH1980 ( talk) 22:27, 5 February 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Weak Delete Not sure if this can be improved to the point where it can be kept. If it can, I'll remove my comment here. South Nashua ( talk) 16:22, 7 February 2017 (UTC) reply

Keep and improve: Here I found the reference for this drama series. I guess we can improve this page to make it notable. However, the major contributor to the page seems to have some connection with the subject. May be a COI issue Monfernape 18:18, 11 February 2017 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by عثمان خلیل ( talkcontribs) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  B E C K Y S A Y L E 03:35, 13 February 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary ( talk) 06:48, 16 February 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary ( talk) 06:48, 16 February 2017 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kurykh ( talk) 02:55, 21 February 2017 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.