The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete.
Mz7 (
talk) 01:32, 25 April 2018 (UTC)reply
Delete, though whilst not new (
this news post is from end of 2015), it doesn't seem to have had any media reporting about it or any discussions to make it notable in any way. You could argue
WP:TOOSOON if it had just been released, though over 2 years and still nothing of any note? I think it is just promotional and not really in need of an article. Bungle(
talk •
contribs) 22:10, 17 April 2018 (UTC)reply
Delete Not notable.
Adabow (
talk) 23:42, 17 April 2018 (UTC)reply
Delete Not notable.
Acnetj (
talk) 09:05, 18 April 2018 (UTC)reply
Delete clearly fails
WP:SIGCOV and
WP:SOFTWARE. The app is simply not notable and nothing exists to assert how the app is significant enough to include in an encyclopedia. The only coverage of the subject I found is (
[1]) an article from 2015 which mentions 80 teachers using the app; this news article is also not viable as a source as it consist to a large degree of interviews with teachers. The path to deletion is open wide.--
SamHolt6 (
talk) 04:49, 19 April 2018 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.