- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Rubbish computer ( Talk: Contribs) 09:00, 2 May 2019 (UTC)
Jill Soltau
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Jill Soltau ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
fails WP:GNG. Sheldybett ( talk) 04:42, 25 April 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 07:00, 25 April 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 07:00, 25 April 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ohio-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 07:00, 25 April 2019 (UTC)
- Strong keep. Article needs serious work but she is the CEO of major retail outlets. Other CEOs, of much smaller organizations, have articles. According to Forbes, it is a Fortune 500 company. So should she. MensanDeltiologist ( talk) 15:55, 25 April 2019 (UTC)
- Keep. Added information, new sources, and rewrote portions to support her work as a CEO of a major retailer. I don't think this article should have been nominated AfD. 9H48F ( talk) 17:20, 25 April 2019 (UTC)
- Keep (after edit conflict). The CEO of such a large company is obviously notable, as has been confirmed by the sources added to this article. There seems to be something wrong with our general concept of what should be covered in an encyclopedia when all the ins and outs of minor people working in the popular music, sports or TV industries get covered but the CEO of a company that has far more impact on consumers gets questioned. Phil Bridger ( talk) 17:28, 25 April 2019 (UTC)
- Soft keep The article, without question, needs additional citations for verification but what is there passes the bare minimum (for me at least). Trillfendi ( talk) 19:18, 25 April 2019 (UTC)
- Keep per those above. Mosaicberry ( talk) 19:33, 25 April 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.