From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America 1000 00:23, 12 July 2017 (UTC) reply

Jessica Coward

Jessica Coward (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable as either a bxer or as an actress. Seems to be part of an attempt to advertise her DVDs. PRehse ( talk) 09:44, 4 July 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Boxing-related deletion discussions. PRehse ( talk) 09:44, 4 July 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 10:34, 4 July 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 10:34, 4 July 2017 (UTC) reply

This page follows Wikipedia guidelines and policies and there is no advertising at all. There are only facts being stated. 'Jessica Coward' has been on Wikipedia since 2013. Ggmatrix (talk) 16:15, 4 July 2017 (UTC)

This person PRehse states "Seems to be part of an attempt to advertise her DVDs. PRehse (talk) 09:44, 4 July 2017 (UTC)". There is absolutely no need to advertise anything and Wikipedia wouldn't be the place to do so as Mittology is known worldwide. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ggmatrix (talk • contribs)

  • Delete - Fails WP:GNG and, as only a regional amateur competitor, WP:NBOX. No media coverage is cited and a cursory search does not turn up anything independent of her or her husband, let alone a reliable news-source. In reply to comments above, neither validity of facts nor length of time an article has been up establishes notability. This must come independently from both Wikipedia and the subject of an article. El Pharao ( talk) 19:10, 5 July 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Delete per nom and El Pharao - GretLomborg ( talk) 19:23, 7 July 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Delete No significant independent coverage in reliable sources to meet WP:GNG and some success in local amateur boxing events fails to meet the boxing notability criteria at WP:NBOX. No evidence of being notable as an actress. Papaursa ( talk) 17:02, 9 July 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Delete per nom and failing WP:NBOX. -- Kbabej ( talk) 01:52, 11 July 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 21:00, 11 July 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 21:00, 11 July 2017 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.