The result was delete. Cirt ( talk) 02:44, 6 November 2008 (UTC) reply
The article was recently recreated based on a new source being available and used as a reference. This seems to partially deal with the issues brought up in the previous AfD (hence I didn't tag it as a G4 candidate) but I still do not think that the article's subject meets the inclusion criteria. The one additional source is from a local newspaper ( [1]) which doesn't really show the level of reliable sourcing required by the general notability criteria or the specific criteria for people . I have not been able to find any other reliable sources which could be used to provide verifiable information for the article and the general content of the one local newspaper source (which was published two days) ago seems to indicate that none are likely to exist to be found (first solo show, local gallery). Guest9999 ( talk) 18:05, 1 November 2008 (UTC) reply