The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. There is also a consensus that the articles needs to be edited for neutrality.
(non-admin closure)Atlantic306 (
talk) 17:56, 25 December 2018 (UTC)reply
Highly promotional. References more about the company. Created by a blocked user. Fails
WP:BIO. scope_creepTalk 17:54, 18 December 2018 (UTC)reply
Stephanie Korey (
|
talk |
history |
protect |
delete |
links |
watch |
logs |
views) I would like to nominate this page for deletion, with the discussion. Both pages were created by a blocked user. Both have been sitting too long for G5. This is also promotional. Terrible references. Fails
WP:BIO. scope_creepTalk 19:02, 18 December 2018 (UTC)reply
Neutral on Rubio, Weak Keep on Korey - Granted these may be promotional and/or paid, but the chief standard to follow in these discussions is
WP:NOTABILITY. These two women are chief executives of what's a clearly notable business. Korey seems to have some direct coverage in reasonably high-quality RS, and both women appear to have slew of mentions in RS. Frankly I think they may pass the bar for
WP:GNG.
Scope is right that these articles clearly have issues, but I'm not sure deletion is the solution.
NickCT (
talk) 20:32, 18 December 2018 (UTC)reply
Keep Both Both articles include the requisite reliable and verifiable references supporting the claim of notability for both individuals as founders of Away, one of the largest such startups founded by women.
Alansohn (
talk) 22:45, 18 December 2018 (UTC)reply
Keep Sources certainly check out but the article as a whole needs cleanup as it's promotional in tone.
sixtynine• whaddya want? • 02:05, 19 December 2018 (UTC)reply
Comment It looks as though it is verging towards keep for both of them. I will give it another day, and if somebody turns up without being canvanssed, I'll withdraw it, for keep. scope_creepTalk 08:10, 20 December 2018 (UTC)reply
Weak keep on both. I think there is enough significant coverage in reliable, independent sources to establish notability for both. There are quite a few non-independent sources too, which could perhaps be removed to make it clearer that they meet
WP:BASIC.
RebeccaGreen (
talk) 15:37, 25 December 2018 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.