The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Keep : As written doesn’t fit notability but a quick google search shows there is likely enough Top tier articles And podcasts about her And her business to qualify. This should sandbox or just note as a stub.
Juju (
talk) 21:55, 18 October 2020 (UTC)reply
The first five reference in the google search are dependent sources, her branding. No one is saying there is not coverage, its the quality of the coverage that is absent. Quality matters. It needs to be independent, reliable and in-depth. It is simply her business on the web and it not reliable, nor independent for the most part. There is no secondary sources to speak of. scope_creepTalk 22:30, 18 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete insufficient independent reliable sources to show notability.
John Pack Lambert (
talk) 15:47, 19 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanztalk 02:41, 26 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete Founded a company 20 yrs ago and has 20 some employees. Nothing to make it stand out from others in the field.
Oaktree b (
talk) 20:00, 26 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete Seems to be a run of the article about a person going about their business and the sources are muh. So, I'm going with delete. --
Adamant1 (
talk) 09:11, 2 November 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.