The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. Sandstein 18:02, 23 June 2020 (UTC)reply
Fails
WP:BIO and
WP:SIGCOV. Lots of names and passing mentions in relation to companies, but very little specific to the person. Fails
WP:THREE. No secondary sources. scope_creepTalk 21:53, 2 June 2020 (UTC)reply
I have added four more reliable sources (Hollywood Reporter, IndieWire, Deadline and Venture Count Star) - this should meet the requirements for
WP:THREE
--
DaJerm (
talk) 03:22, 5 June 2020 (UTC)reply
Comment They seem to be appointments notices are very low quality references, not the
WP:SECONDARY sources that are needed notability. I don't see any grouping of references that prove
WP:BIO merely a bunch of paid advertising, mentions in relation to company and promotion/branding. scope_creepTalk 14:36, 8 June 2020 (UTC)reply
You have 5 reference that are all same notice. There is a single decent source amongst the lot of them. scope_creepTalk 14:38, 8 June 2020 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:53, 9 June 2020 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:23, 16 June 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.