The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep.
Daniel (
talk) 20:35, 11 January 2023 (UTC)reply
Subject is not noteworthy, original page was created many years ago as fluff, very empty page after spam has been removed
Nickgray (
talk) 20:34, 4 January 2023 (UTC)reply
Keep There are at least two solid sources, the
NY Times and
Fast Company. The article is a bit sparse but the person meets GNG, IMO.
Lamona (
talk) 18:22, 5 January 2023 (UTC)reply
Keep per above. Based on the sources already in the article, it seems as though this nom was misplaced.
Bearian (
talk) 14:23, 10 January 2023 (UTC)reply
Keep meets SIGCOV per above. //
Timothy ::
talk 13:03, 11 January 2023 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.