The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Out of the sources provided, all of the ones I have checked were press releases, brief mentions and non-RS'. The leading trade magazine, PRWeek, has no search results for them except for
this blurb. Promotional article on non-notable PR firm, far from attaining the two in-depth profile stories outlined at
WP:CORP.
CorporateM (
Talk) 15:47, 12 December 2014 (UTC)reply
Delete per nom. It's not exactly spam, but I don't see how this is anything more than another veryrun of the mill public relations company. The cites given are to YouTube, other social media, and
brief standard listings on the website for Information Week, as well as their own press releases, self-generated content (Market Wired on Yahoo), and web page; none of them are
reliable sources.
Bearian (
talk) 20:06, 16 December 2014 (UTC)reply
Delete I can't find any in-depth reliable sources on this firm and the article as it stands is almost entirely promotional. --
I am One of Many (
talk) 07:39, 19 December 2014 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.