The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete.
Drmies (
talk) 23:55, 20 October 2021 (UTC)reply
He has received two national industry awards that appear however to be
vanity awards. A review of the references shows that none of them appear to be independent and reliable.
Number
Reference
Remarks
Independent
Significant
Reliable
Secondary
1
Instrumental
Artist info page
No
No
2
CratesHub
Appears to be listing for pay site
No
No
3
GHGossip
Artist info
No
No
4
Ghana Music
Appears to be an industry rag
No
No
5
3Music
Report of vanity awards
No
No
6
VGMA Awards
Report of vanity awards
No
No
Recommend that the article be deleted and the draft left standing for possible expansion.
Robert McClenon (
talk) 03:09, 27 September 2021 (UTC)reply
Delete - The nominator's case against unreliable sources is convincing, and I can find nothing else beyond obvious promo announcements shelled out by his agent. No opinion on the draftspace issue. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (
TALK|
CONTRIBS) 20:25, 27 September 2021 (UTC)reply
Keep. Passes
WP:ANYBIO and
WP:MUSICBIO. Won a
Vodafone Ghana Music Award which is broadcast on
GHOne TV and is basically Ghana's equivalent to the Grammys. Additionally the source analysis above is suspect, as some of those publications that supposedly lack independence have editorial boards with paid on staff independent journalists (such as Ghana Music). There is clearly a Western bias present coloring the source analysis.
4meter4 (
talk) 19:00, 3 October 2021 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗plicit 04:45, 4 October 2021 (UTC)reply
Comment Just going to reiterate 4meter4's point that being an "industry rag" does not make a source unreliable or non-independent. However, all of the sources currently in the article are only trivial coverage, so unless there are other sources, he still fails
WP:GNG. I'm not familiar with the Vodafone Ghana Music Award, so I have no opinion on whether he satisfies
WP:ANYBIO. Also, CratesHub and GhGossip both have download links, so unless the song is free to share, those websites are illegal.
Mlb96 (
talk) 05:15, 4 October 2021 (UTC)reply
Weak delete, subject hasn’t gained substantial coverage in reliable sources, fails
WP:GNG. A case of
WP:TOOSOON. -
Xclusivzik (
talk) 00:06, 5 October 2021 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Black Kite (talk) 22:24, 11 October 2021 (UTC)reply
Delete-keeping both namespace wont be working, it is best way to keep draft part and delete article namespace. When draft will pass for article then it will be converted into article namespace.
Jyoti Roy (
talk) 14:39, 12 October 2021 (UTC)reply
Comment. The subject won a notable award that's televised on Ghana's
GHOne TV; the fifth most watched television channel in that nation. It's not a minor award, but a significant national music award. The delete votes are completely ignoring
WP:ANYBIO and
WP:MUSICBIO criteria for artists who have won a notable award in what amounts to a western bias. Major national music awards count when weighing notability through our relevant SNGs.
4meter4 (
talk) 20:14, 12 October 2021 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.