The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Consensus is that while
WP:RS exist, they are insufficient to meet
WP:GNG. --
RoySmith(talk) 00:16, 9 July 2017 (UTC)reply
Currently not ranked in the top 1000 in any
WCA event.[1] — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Tkwikihelper (
talk •
contribs) 21:34, June 13, 2017 (UTC)
Comment This page was created without the {{afd2}} template and not transcluded to a daily log. Fixed now--I remain neutral on the nomination itself at this time. --
Finngalltalk 23:16, 13 June 2017 (UTC)reply
Keep no assertion that the two offline references already in the article don't cover her. Both appear to be independent RS, so GNG appears already to be met. The nom's complaint might be relevant if she needed to meet an SNG and the GNG, but I am aware of no SNG for speedcubers, and meeting the SNG or the GNG would be adequate for inclusion.
Jclemens (
talk) 22:14, 20 June 2017 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:52, 21 June 2017 (UTC)reply
Delete I cannot find either original source article. However, the first being an article in a magazine is unlikely to establish notability, while the latter is in a local newspaper. It seems that meeting GNG could best be done by considering her achievements as a cuber. Although she held numerous Oceania records, her times are nevertheless not particularly impressive, even given what I know of the methods and cube quality of the early 2000s. Cubing was only just returning to popularity when she held these records.
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 06:46, 29 June 2017 (UTC)reply
Delete as per nom. A trivial reference to her participation in a Rubik's cube solving competition isn't sufficient.
Power~enwiki (
talk) 07:02, 29 June 2017 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.