![]() | This discussion was subject to a
deletion review on 2010 August 19. For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review. |
The result was delete. Cirt ( talk) 18:56, 2 February 2010 (UTC) reply
![]() | If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:
spa|username}} ; suspected
canvassed users: {{subst:
canvassed|username}} ; accounts blocked for
sockpuppetry: {{subst:
csm|username}} or {{subst:
csp|username}} . |
All of these sources are blogs - some are from people at news outlets, but there is no indication that they are subject to the same editorial scrutiny that news stories are subject to - therefore fail
WP:Reliable. {{
findsources}}
returns only 2 results, both press releases. As a result I can only conclude that this article written by a
WP:COI
WP:SPA is about a company that fails
WP:Corp.
Toddst1 (
talk) 08:01, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
reply
{{
findsources}}
on talk page.
Toddst1 (
talk) 09:22, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
reply