The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 22:47, 2 November 2020 (UTC) reply

Jamil Saidi

Jamil Saidi (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

non notable politician with no indication of satisfying WP:NPOL, WP:GNG. Sources cited are paid PR pieces and mention the subject briefly. Umakant Bhalerao ( talk) 21:38, 26 October 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Umakant Bhalerao ( talk) 21:38, 26 October 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Umakant Bhalerao ( talk) 21:38, 26 October 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Umakant Bhalerao ( talk) 21:38, 26 October 2020 (UTC) reply

• Delete - PR articles and non notable politician. - Tatupiplu' ^talk 07:02, 27 October 2020 (UTC) reply
• Delete. The article does not suggest that he's ever held any political role that we consider to be "inherently" notable per WP:NPOL (national or state legislature or cabinet) — it says only that he's been general secretary of a political party's youth chapter and that he campaigned on behalf of actual election candidates as a surrogate, neither of which are notability-clinching roles. And the sources aren't getting him over WP:GNG, either: three of them explicitly label themselves as press releases from his own company with "no journalist was involved in the creation of this content" disclaimers, one explicitly labels itself as "branded content" (which is really just another way of saying "press release from his own company with no journalist involved in the creation of the content"), and the last is just a Q&A interview in which somebody happens to passingly mention Jamil Saidi's name in the process of discussing something else. Which means exactly zero of them constitute valid or reliably sourced support for Jamil Saidi's notability at all. Bearcat ( talk) 15:05, 27 October 2020 (UTC) reply
• Delete Non-notable politician. fails GNG. Priyanjali singh ( talk) 13:56, 29 October 2020 (UTC) reply
• Delete Notability is not established and sources weak. Expertwikiguy ( talk) 17:29, 30 October 2020 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.