The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. –
Joe (
talk) 12:31, 25 August 2020 (UTC)reply
Speedy keep miserable failure of a deletion nomination, basically
WP:JUSTNOTNOTABLE, with no attempt at evaluation by
WP:PROF. He clearly passes #C5 (named chair) based only on the text of the article as nominated, and even a cursory search of Google Scholar also shows heavy enough citations to pass #C1. —
David Eppstein (
talk) 18:56, 18 August 2020 (UTC)reply
Speedy keep As noted above, he passes
WP:PROF#C1 and
C5, and the nomination makes no attempt to argue otherwise.
XOR'easter (
talk) 19:47, 18 August 2020 (UTC)reply
Speedy keep Named chair - obvious pass of
WP:PROF, nevermind citations, etc. -
Kj cheetham (
talk) 20:01, 20 August 2020 (UTC)reply
Keep He holds a named chair at a major university so he clearly meets the academic notability guidelines. There is no reason however to speedy this discussion.
John Pack Lambert (
talk) 19:16, 21 August 2020 (UTC)reply
Comment I for one was thinking of speedy under
WP:SKCRIT #3. It may yet turn into a
WP:SNOW in any case. -
Kj cheetham (
talk) 19:22, 21 August 2020 (UTC)reply
Keep Nomination does not explain a legitimate reason for deletion, the subject clearly meets NPROF.
WP:SNOW would be apt.
PainProf (
talk) 22:34, 21 August 2020 (UTC)reply
Keep. Clear pass of
WP:Prof#C1. Nominator should carry out
WP:Before before making further nominations.
Xxanthippe (
talk) 02:41, 24 August 2020 (UTC).reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.