The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
PROD requested, but denied for being Grammy nominated. However,
WP:ANYBIO requires winning once, or being nominated multiple times. Is twice good enough? I read multiple as something greater than two. So, fails ANYBIO. Even more, none of the references pass
WP:SIRS, so fails
WP:GNG. -
UtherSRG(talk) 14:41, 16 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Delete. Fails
WP:GNG/
WP:NBIO. Sources are database entries and press releases. No significant coverage.
Jfire (
talk) 16:05, 16 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Delete — to add to what UtherSRG said, he was nominated for
one Grammy, not two, together with four other people. Also, the article is by a banned sockpuppet and paid editor, which we shouldn’t reward. —
BiruitorulTalk 18:27, 16 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Comment As per this link
[1], as well as the Grammy nomination, he has been nominated for a
Golden Globe. Also - clearly
WP:MUSICBIO applies here. Resonant
Distortion 19:47, 16 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Keep With named nominations for two three notable awards, that is sufficient to meet
WP:MUSICBIO#8. There's also sufficient
WP:RS to show the subject meets
WP:COMPOSER#1. I have cleaned up the article including removing non-RS citations and adding several more, which may not be multiple lines in depth but do contribute per
WP:BASIC, so any "whiff" of paid editor contribution no longer applies. Resonant
Distortion 23:14, 16 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Comment per the Billboard reference just added to the article - Dring was a named credit in the nomination of the
Feel Good Inc. Grammy award. So he does have two Grammy nominations, plus the Golden Globe; I've updated my !vote. Resonant
Distortion 15:47, 17 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Keep Per ResonantDistortion.
X (
talk) 20:45, 18 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Delete per nom. Subject specific guidelines are for guidance only - every topic has to meet WP:GNG when WP:AFD is invoked. It seems unlikely that we will find
WP:SIGCOV about him. Fails
WP:GNG and
WP:PROMO.
2A02:AB88:4C01:7500:84E:6485:B66C:DC73 (
talk) 22:17, 20 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, LizRead!Talk! 23:15, 23 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Delete also per
WP:NOTINHERITED. Article is rife with the requisite heavy namedropping and coattailing (Jamie T in particular) in attempt to cover for lack of individual notability and weak press-release sourcing. Being nominated just once for a soundtrack song all the way back in 2010, signing an agreement, and his recent production for an unknown indie artist (Terra Twin) aren't enough for SIGCOV.
💥Casualty• Hop along. • 00:20, 24 April 2024 (UTC)reply
(1) "all the way back in 2010" The date of the Grammy nomination is irrelevant as per
WP:NTEMP, (2) Dring has been a Grammy nominee twice not once, the first in 2005, which is verified by a RS in the article, (3) The reason the article is "rife with the requisite heavy namedropping" is because the subject has made credited and verified contributions to a number of notable works, (4) two credited grammy nominations does rather indicate that notability by association does not apply, and (5) There are
c. 14 words devoted to Jamie T, which does not appear undue, given that, for example, on the album
Trick "sees Jamie T play all instruments alongside longterm collaborator James Dring" (
[2]). I know I am probably repeating myself, but
WP:BASIC,
WP:MUSICBIO and
WP:COMPOSER all apply. Resonant
Distortion 07:23, 24 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Relisting. This discussion is leaning towards Delete but I don't see a rebuttal to the assertion that this subject meets
WP:MUSICBIO and
WP:COMPOSER. It's also common for subject in music production to mention artists they have worked with and albums they have produced so that doesn't seem like name-dropping. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, LizRead!Talk! 23:47, 30 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Comment The article has been edited further - which includes a certain mount of tidying up, but also more text and RS that confirm further songwriting/composer credit on notable works. Resonant
Distortion 22:37, 4 May 2024 (UTC)reply
Delete: the producer has worked with lots of notable artists and worked on notable songs and albums, however he doesn't seem to have the individual notability required to have an article. He has passing mentions in many references, but few of these could be called significant coverage of the subject himself.
InDimensional (
talk) 10:55, 5 May 2024 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.