The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep.
Rlendog (
talk) 22:13, 28 February 2012 (UTC)reply
Delete. Non notable person. So he did some editing and writing for non-notable publications. Wow! --
Alan Liefting (
talk -
contribs) 05:39, 21 February 2012 (UTC)reply
Keep. So-called "notability" is shorthand for "there aren't any reliable sources for this topic", which is clearly not the case. Also, he was "notable" enough for the
The Nuttall Encyclopædia. Pointless deletionism is not in the interest of the encyclopedia. --
Magnus Manske (
talk) 08:54, 21 February 2012 (UTC)reply
There is a notability guideline that is used as a guide for including or excluding article. I am contesting the notability of this topic based on those guidelines. Also, an entry in The Nuttall Encyclopædia is not a guarantee of notability for WP. The notability of your name did give me pause when putting the article up for deletion ! --
Alan Liefting (
talk -
contribs) 09:30, 21 February 2012 (UTC)reply
This, in conjunction with "Further reading" and "External links" on
James Begg (plus Nuttall) should suffice. --
Magnus Manske (
talk) 17:05, 21 February 2012 (UTC)reply
Keep -- The present article is a mere stub, but this
biography clearly shows notability. Being Moderator of the Scottish Free Church should be sufficient in itslef.
Peterkingiron (
talk) 17:13, 21 February 2012 (UTC)reply
Keep - There are multiple secondary sources, so they are a notable person.--
Vclaw (
talk) 17:52, 21 February 2012 (UTC)reply
Keep I've added the Dictionary of National Biography link to the article. There is more needs to be done to the article, for example to bring out his role in the history of Sectarianism in Scotland.
AllyD (
talk) 18:06, 21 February 2012 (UTC)reply
Keep - as per the reasons given above.
Autarch (
talk) 20:54, 21 February 2012 (UTC)reply
Keep. The Dictionary of National Biography is already enough for
WP:BIO, never mind all the other sources. An apparent failure of
WP:BEFORE. --
202.124.74.166 (
talk) 22:25, 21 February 2012 (UTC)reply
Keep. Deletion would necessitate deletion of Thomas Chalmers as well, which is ludicrous. A 19th century figure pre-internet, the very fact of his memoirs being published by a third party is adequate satisfaction of WP:GNG. The subject is notable both as a theologian and architectural influence.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.