The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. It's certainly possible for a historical figure of this type to meet our notability standards, but so far the evidence is lacking to show that he does in particular.
RL0919 (
talk) 06:07, 15 July 2021 (UTC)reply
I will be editing the main page and adding additional information that will hopefully address the concerns
Bryan MacKinnon (
talk) 01:52, 22 June 2021 (UTC)reply
Delete. Does not meet
WP:GNG. My search on Google Books turns up no significant coverage of this person. My search on Newspapers.com turns up a flew short burbs from Nashville newspapers about Avent's travels to China, but this is not sufficient for GNG. –
Lord Bolingbroke (
talk) 03:18, 22 June 2021 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment:@
Bryanmackinnon: Please make an argument for notability if there is one. Deletion discussion's aren't typically kept open for more than a week or two.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –
Joe (
talk) 13:56, 29 June 2021 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Extraordinary Writ (
talk) 17:30, 6 July 2021 (UTC)reply
Delete — Basically the same rationale as that of
4meter4 I do not see in-depth significant coverage in RS. Furthermore why has this not been closed per
WP:NPASR ? Celestina007 (
talk) 18:07, 6 July 2021 (UTC)reply
Celestina007, I think it was relisted to give
Bryanmackinnon more time to present evidence of notability. However I suspect there has been no further response simply because there isn’t any more evidence to be found.
4meter4 (
talk) 18:21, 6 July 2021 (UTC)reply
Delete, per nom. "Executive" is too vague a term, we cannot assume it was a c-level. No other real claim to notability noted other than familial relations which do not transfer notability.
Ifnord (
talk) 23:45, 14 July 2021 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.