The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to
Mutiara line without prejudice against a selective merge of content, where editorially justified.
Owen×☎ 14:46, 12 May 2024 (UTC)reply
A number of stubs have been mass-created on light rail stations for the proposed Mutiara line. They are all estimated to be opening in 2030. None of these stubs say anything of substance about the stations, and so I am proposing they all either be deleted or redirected to
Mutiara line en masse. The stations include the following:
It is a line that is scheduled for construction this year. Why should we delete these pages that will have to created at the end anyways?
gavre (al. PenangLion) (
talk) 04:34, 5 May 2024 (UTC)reply
Redirect all - no evidence of independent notability.
Pi.1415926535 (
talk) 07:40, 5 May 2024 (UTC)reply
Merge before redirecting, some appear to have some information about what is currently on the proposed sites which feels encyclopaedic. TIL they are planning a connection to Seberang Perai.
CMD (
talk) 11:41, 5 May 2024 (UTC)reply
Merge per Chipmunkdavis. There is almost never a reason to delete articles on verifiable stations when a suitable merge target exists, and the outcome of these AfDs is always merge or redirect, so I don't get why they keep being nominated?
Thryduulf (
talk) 12:43, 5 May 2024 (UTC)reply
Redirect as per
WP:EDRED, since
WP:N looks to be a concern as of now. As with other metro lines, coverage will expand in tandem with construction, and leaving open the possibility of later conversions into full-fledged articles.
hundenvonPG (
talk) 05:03, 7 May 2024 (UTC)reply
Trainsandotherthings, you have not formatted this bundled nomination correctly. You just created a list of articles which is not appropriate. It will be very difficult for a closer to close this discussion using the XFDcloser editing tool that we use. Please review the instructions for bundled nominations at
WP:AFD and reformat your nomination. LizRead!Talk! 22:35, 11 May 2024 (UTC)reply
This may come as a surprise to you, but I have never closed an AfD discussion before. It would have taken you all of two seconds to simply say "please use Template:La for the list". In any event, I have done so.
Trainsandotherthings (
talk) 00:37, 12 May 2024 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.