From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:12, 26 November 2020 (UTC) reply

Jacqueline Reses

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

Jacqueline Reses (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Resume-like BLP of businesswoman with no clear claim of notability, sourced mainly to corporate news pieces about new appointments. Mccapra ( talk) 21:08, 8 November 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Mccapra ( talk) 21:08, 8 November 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Mccapra ( talk) 21:08, 8 November 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Management-related deletion discussions. Mccapra ( talk) 21:08, 8 November 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Mccapra ( talk) 21:08, 8 November 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:55, 8 November 2020 (UTC) reply
Given the available RS, I'd encourage continuing to build out the entry rather than outright deletion, erring on the side of increasing representation of women in finance. BelBivDov ( talk)
  • Delete The references are really poor and what references are there are a mix of appointment announcements, press-release, deprecated sources like Techcrunch and churnalism. The references present above, as proof that she notable are in a similar state. The first is an announcement, is dependent. The 2nd one is a name mention only. The 3rd is similar and 4th one is similar. It is a dependent source. None of them are secondary, and none of them are in-depth. They are run WP:MILL, WP:SPIP sources. scope_creep Talk 13:48, 10 November 2020 (UTC) reply
I can't see how either of the Business Insider articles specifically are dependent or mill; I'm not seeing any sign of direct contribution or churnalism. Providing a couple more articles I just found as comment below. BelBivDov ( talk)
  • Keep passes WP:BASIC based on multiple independent sources combined to demonstrate notability and if you do a search there is a recent American Banker article on her.-- FrankTursetta ( talk) 19:55, 14 November 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Keep - Her business roles and position at the San Francisco Fed are a strong claim of notability, and the sources in the article and those identified above provide the reliable and verifiable coverage that support that claim. Alansohn ( talk) 23:59, 14 November 2020 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spartaz Humbug! 21:53, 16 November 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from " https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Jacqueline_Reses&oldid=990702930"