From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. and lightly salted. Liz Read! Talk! 06:33, 13 July 2023 (UTC) reply

Jacob Gaffney

Jacob Gaffney (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Previously deleted [1] - subject still likely to fail WP:NBIO. Not seeing anything that would demonstrate SIGCOV - just a number of non-notable business ventures with minimal coverage. KH-1 ( talk) 07:06, 6 July 2023 (UTC) reply

Delete PROMO, wow. 19 yr old person that isn't notable. There seems to be some scandal with the business/enterprise thing but I can't find much more than PR sources; even then there are less than 6 of them, not even much paid promo. Oaktree b ( talk) 12:03, 6 July 2023 (UTC) reply
  • Delete - This seems very much like WP:PAID work and is heavy on PROMO. Most sources are not directly about the individual he is just mentioned. Not to mention the article is extremely hard to read in a normal manner. Grahaml35 ( talk) 12:59, 6 July 2023 (UTC) reply
  • Delete and Salt - Previous deletion discussion was clear this article should be deleted to prevent us from being in this situation again in a month this article should also be salted.-- VViking Talk Edits 13:43, 6 July 2023 (UTC) reply
  • Delete: PROMO & REFBOMB. Tatupiplu' talk 16:46, 6 July 2023 (UTC) reply
  • Delete and salt - I found no good refs. Also, compare the edit histories of the article's two major contributors; both also edit Mary Blathwayt and Emily Blathwayt, early 20th century suffragettes:
The author of the first version, Shyguy125 (now blocked), also removed the tags from Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jacob T. Gaffney
Clearly bad faith editing. Both "Jacob T. Gaffney" and "Jacob Gaffney" should be salted.
Jacob Gaffney is not yet 20; he has a long time left to earn his article here.
-- A. B. ( talkcontribsglobal count) 18:44, 6 July 2023 (UTC) reply
  • Delete - Spotify and IMDB cant be used as a source and the remaining citations are not enough to make it meet notability. Hkkingg ( talk) 21:18, 6 July 2023 (UTC) reply
  • Delete per everyone above. Best, GPL93 ( talk) 15:41, 7 July 2023 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.