- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Daniel ( talk) 19:45, 6 August 2021 (UTC)
Jacks or Better
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Jacks or Better ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article fails WP:NFO; needs two or more reviews in order to be eligible. The Film Creator ( talk) 18:31, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:24, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
- Delete. I couldn't find anything other than the sole review, so I concur with this not passing NFILM. ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (｡◕‿◕｡) 23:28, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
- Delete - fails WP:NFILMS and WP:GNG. Except the single review from Variety, I found no other reliable independent sources that show significant coverage on the film. Given the lack of coverage, it does not appear to be notable enough to have a stand-alone article. -- Ashleyyoursmile ( talk) 06:44, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
- Delete it seems weird that Variety is the only source for this but I really couldn't find any others. BuySomeApples ( talk) 02:37, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.