The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Daniel ( talk) 00:18, 20 September 2021 (UTC) reply

Jack E. Robinson III

Jack E. Robinson III (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Perennial candidate fails WP:NPOL. No lasting impact or coverage. KidAd • SPEAK 23:36, 12 September 2021 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Shellwood ( talk) 23:47, 12 September 2021 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions. Shellwood ( talk) 23:47, 12 September 2021 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 02:22, 13 September 2021 (UTC) reply

• Delete: The fact that there his death was announced in the Boston Globe, and there are some scant other non-routine sources that do provide WP:SIGCOV make it close, but I think it still fails WP:GNG; some newspaper sources may exist (my newspapers.com subscription is in the process of renewal so I can't check) , but as of right now, no dice. Also, searches are further hampered because his grandfather, who has the same name, was apparently a local bigshot back in the day. Curbon7 ( talk) 05:54, 13 September 2021 (UTC) reply
  • Also looking at the previous AfD from 2008, those really were different times. Curbon7 ( talk) 05:57, 13 September 2021 (UTC) reply
• Delete. People do not get articles just for running as candidates in elections they did not win, but this features neither a credible claim that he had preexisting notability for other reasons besides the candidacy nor sufficient sourcing to deem his candidacies more special than everybody else's candidacies. Bearcat ( talk) 18:56, 17 September 2021 (UTC) reply
• Delete, fails WP:NPOL and I can't see any indication that he passes WP:GNG. Suonii180 ( talk) 22:48, 18 September 2021 (UTC) reply
• Comment: His candidacy for the 2000 United States Senate election in Massachusetts certainly appears sufficiently special - WP, NYT, TAL Economist - to a level where redirection and capsule coverage there would be reasonable. I don't see reviews sufficient to meet WP:AUTHOR. ^~ Hydronium^~Hydroxide^{~ (Talk)~} 03:20, 19 September 2021 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.