- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 23:43, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
J C Chaudhry
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- J C Chaudhry ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This article was moved prematurely out of Draft by cut-paste, bypassing the WP:AFC process. Additionally, WP:MEAT and WP:SOCK were at play creating the article in the first place, which speaks to a possible WP:COI.
Moreover, although there has been some press regarding business, does not seem to rise to level of WP:NBIO: associated with company that no longer exists, as it was sold to a competitor. I suspect any awards or honours given are not notable enough under WP:ANYBIO. WP:NAUTHOR is not reached. Poojean ( talk) 19:22, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Poojean ( talk) 19:22, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Poojean ( talk) 19:22, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Poojean ( talk) 19:22, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Poojean ( talk) 19:22, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
 | If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:
spa|username}}; suspected
canvassed users: {{subst:
canvassed|username}}; accounts blocked for
sockpuppetry: {{subst:
csm|username}} or {{subst:
csp|username}}. |
- Delete Nothing more than PR. Fails GNG. Mtpos ( talk) 04:21, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp ( talk) 13:35, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
- Delete GNG fail and a Promo article to boot. Best, GPL93 ( talk) 14:56, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Fails WP:GNG & Totaly based on promo. Juggyevil ( talk) 08:48, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
- Keep The article was once rewritten. The earlier one was without inline citations and proper references. Did add the inline citations. Will try to find more contextual and relevant citations. was asking help for writing the same ( 202.88.237.193 ( talk) 09:36, 2 December 2021 (UTC))
- Keep The article was once rewritten and no promotional content has been uploaded. Please guide on rectification. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 115.248.80.209 ( talk) 12:29, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Clearly promo, not notable, and created/edited by COI editors. So I see no reason to keep it. It's not like the person who created it can't do another draft at some point and actually send it through the AfC process next time either. -- Adamant1 ( talk) 15:03, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Its a request to all those who are suggesting to delete the page - please guide on what changes are to be made ? MR Chaudhry is a example of how a normal teacher can become a successful entrepreneur with right ethics. Every content on his page is realistic about him, a person like Mr Chaudhry doesn’t need PR. He have achieved the highest success in his life. His intention is only to give back to the society thats it.. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2409:4050:2E85:4ABF:D5C5:A078:F313:B682 ( talk) 04:26, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
- Keep I think the Wikipedians should guide on maintaining the page, Mr Chaudhry has been covered by the Mainstream media, also he has never sold his company to a competitor - Byjus were never into classroom sessions, They have rather merged up and Mr Chaudhry is a Stakeholder of complete conglomerate of Byjus which includes Aakash Inst as well. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rimplesethi ( talk • contribs) 04:43, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
- Keep He is a renowned entrepreneur and a Inspiration to many people in India. This profile should not be deleted. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
115.248.80.209 (
talk) 06:47, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
— Duplicate vote:
115.248.80.209 (
talk) has already cast a vote above. - Keep Mr Chaudhry is a philanthropist, This account should not be deleted. It can be reworked. What really touched me was that he has constructed a place of worship at Vrindavan. there is an altruistic thought of him behind constructing it. He wanted a place where people could come from all parts of the country to seek blessings and be at peace. It is a spiritual place with a natural environment and lush greenery. Catching the first glimpse of the location in the morning gives a sense of peace, which I liked the most! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2409:4050:2DBB:1620:D830:920A:30A7:D39F ( talk) 08:40, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Continuously adding Keep comments from different ip addresses, strong indication of Wikipedia:SOCK. Also fails WP:NAUTHOR and WP:GNG. MickyShy ( talk) 09:33, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Mr. J C Chaudhry is a true inspirator. Just because of his motivation and inspiration, my son is a doctor today. I support this Wikipedia page as many are there who still need to know about this man. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2409:4050:2DBB:1620:A776:B844:41C1:3E37 ( talk) 10:03, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Fails WP:NAUTHOR and any other applicable guideline. The sock-puppet chorus is just embarrassing. XOR'easter ( talk) 16:17, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
- Delete the news are not significant and not enough. Chelokabob ( talk) 22:12, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
- It's very difficult to come to an objective conclusion when the discussion keeps getting disrupted in this way. The sock-puppet chorus is counter-productive as well as embarrassing. Phil Bridger ( talk) 17:18, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
- Delete hopelessly promotional, and that's enough reason, especially since notability as anauthor or scholar is extremely borderline at best, and the refs are insufficiently reliable for GNG. . The keep arguments are straightforward ILIKEIT. DGG ( talk ) 00:55, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
- Delete fails WP:NAUTHOR and WP:GNG. Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk) 11:46, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.