The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete without prejudice against draftification upon request.
Arbitrarily0(
talk) 02:58, 30 January 2024 (UTC)reply
Non-notable product concept. No evidence of significant coverage in reliable sources.
WP:PROMO/
WP:COI concerns as well -- the article's creator appears to be associated with the product, and the page has been deleted twice for notability and spam reasons and then re-created by the same user.
Jfire (
talk) 17:34, 8 January 2024 (UTC)reply
Delete Should be salted this time.
Raymond3023 (
talk) 03:40, 10 January 2024 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Relisting, Previously PROD'd article so Soft Deletion is not an option. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, LizRead!Talk! 23:04, 15 January 2024 (UTC)reply
Delete. No product, no implementation, no article. --
Ouro (
blah blah) 10:25, 17 January 2024 (UTC)reply
Keep - Another day another person trying to reinvent the train. While there is no current implementation, it is mentioned in several news articles including the Boston Globe. The article as it stands now is bad though. I'd be willing to rewrite it if keep is agreed. Also, User:BillJamesMN should be blocked from editing because he's the founder of this and it's a clear conflict of interest.
[1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10] --
StreetcarEnjoyer (
talk) 03:43, 19 January 2024 (UTC)reply
I support draftify as an ATD if you want to rewrite it!
Jfire (
talk) 04:28, 19 January 2024 (UTC)reply
Comment. Another angle: Is the company notable for anything at all? Actually putting a product on the streets, any kind of product? If not, maybe the founder might be notable? @
User:StreetcarEnjoyer: While I see the articles... okay... if there are articles for the concept that can be used, fine, otherwise it's just... well... next of kin to speculation if they haven't actually got anything to show. --
Ouro (
blah blah) 15:54, 22 January 2024 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Relisting to consider option of draftifying as suggested by the nominator. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, LizRead!Talk! 22:31, 22 January 2024 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.