The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Delete: Very likely PROMO, all sourcing I find seems to be book signings or on BookTrib, which isn't RS. No critical reviews of their novels found.
Oaktree b (
talk) 20:46, 21 October 2023 (UTC)reply
Delete - not notable and likely written for money by
BheekAam along with
other articles. The book won Feathered Quill awards but I'm not sure they're sufficient to qualify for notability as an author; here's more info about Feather Quill:
[1][2]
Delete Not notable and few RS citations or recognition.
Go4thProsper (
talk) 21:49, 22 October 2023 (UTC)reply
Delete: Only one source, with no sigcov and the feathered quill award doesn't exactly seem prestigious enough to satisfy any alternative criteria.
ARandomName123 (
talk)Ping me! 22:47, 22 October 2023 (UTC)reply
Delete fails
WP:GNG and his only award is not notability-lending. Appears to wear many hats, but isn't notable in any of them. Best,
GPL93 (
talk) 11:54, 23 October 2023 (UTC)reply
Delete; poorly executed UPE, if they are notable
WP:TNT but I don't think they are anyway. ☆ Bri (
talk) 18:43, 23 October 2023 (UTC)reply
Delete: Only one source provided, and certainly promotional.
HarukaAmaranth春香 19:10, 23 October 2023 (UTC)reply
Delete Not notable and few RS citations or recognition.--
VVikingTalkEdits 14:19, 27 October 2023 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.