- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Kurykh ( talk) 15:04, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
J. E. Arulraj
- J. E. Arulraj ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Could find no significant coverage in multiple published secondary sources to show subject meets WP:BIO NeilN talk to me 19:20, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
- Verify again. You can verify again the full article. It is not copied from any source. All these information are gathered through an opportunity i have received for meeting him. Although i have included many possible references. Kindly ensure that you are finding some more faults with my article so that you can propose more strongly for speedy deletion. Continue your fault finding job. Edson Frainlar ( talk) 19:54, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
- Delete per nom and apparent promo. Chrissymad ❯❯❯ ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 23:17, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
- Delete - No evidence of notability. Another article by promotional author. Robert McClenon ( talk) 23:54, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
- Delete per nom, fails WP:GNG. Theroadislong ( talk) 12:32, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
- Delete The sources provide only passing ention of the subject; no WP:DEPTH of coverage, as per nom. O Fortuna! ...Imperatrix mundi. 14:18, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
- Delete - as per nomination. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 12:15, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.