The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The subject is not sufficiently notable. A single published programming book is not sufficient (See the first criteria of
WP:ACADEMIC, significant impact needs to be proven.) Also, The Gordon Pask Award mentioned in the article is not prestigious enough. It looks like the award is no longer being awarded as I couldn't find any mention post-2010 and it's website
www.paskaward.org is not available. Finally, the few mentioned articles and his work as a consultant are obviously not enough to establish notability.
Lmbro (
talk) 22:02, 1 July 2017 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Dennis Brown -
2¢ 00:31, 10 July 2017 (UTC)reply
Delete No evidence of significant notability.
Kind Tennis Fan (
talk) 04:08, 10 July 2017 (UTC)reply
Delete. Article doesn't make a case for
WP:GNG nor any other notability. —
David Eppstein (
talk) 07:28, 13 July 2017 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.