The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Keep - There are twelve separate references, all cited in the page. Not only at Jihad Watch. (
talk) 23:14, 3 February 2012 (UTC) —
Johnbull1975 (
talk •
contribs) has made
few or no other edits outside this topic. reply
Note- Its not enough that it has sources, the sources themselves must be reliable third party sources in order to be valid for establishing notability, as covered in
WP:Sources. It is very arguable that any of the listed references qualify, especially since the majority of them appear to be non-notable blog posts.
Rorshacma (
talk) 02:11, 5 February 2012 (UTC)reply
Obvious delete, notability requires coverage in reliable sources rather than fringe websites, Blogspot blogs and the like. –
Roscelese (
talk ⋅
contribs) 00:25, 4 February 2012 (UTC)reply
delete lack of coverage in secondary sources. --
SupernovaExplosion (
talk) 05:41, 4 February 2012 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.