The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Autobiography sourced only to a database entry. No publications found in MathSciNet or Google Scholar; no evidence of academic notability nor of notability for more than one thing. My prod saying all this was removed by
User:Kvng with no justification for disputing it, and with a suggestion to instead merge to
positive set theory. There was nothing to merge; everything in this article was already there. I removed it from the positive set theory article as well because it was unsourced and had no hope of being sourced. —
David Eppstein (
talk) 17:32, 13 May 2024 (UTC)reply
Delete -- per David Eppstein -- one thesis is not sufficient for
WP:PROF notability unless it is cited so much as to become a classic of the field. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Mscuthbert (
talk •
contribs) 01:41, 14 May 2024 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.