From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 18:03, 28 August 2022 (UTC) reply

Iran Human Rights Monitor

Iran Human Rights Monitor (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

None of the cited sources is about the organization. There does not seem to be significative coverage about the subject in reliable sources, so it does not pass WP:NCORP or WP:GNG at all. Since this is an affiliate of the National Council of Resistance of Iran [1], that could be a good redirect target. MarioGom ( talk) 22:40, 13 August 2022 (UTC) reply

  • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and Iran. MarioGom ( talk) 22:40, 13 August 2022 (UTC) reply
  • Keep. I just added more citations to the article, and as far as I can see, no other human rights group has provided more data about human rights in Iran. Their findings have been published by the BBC, Aljazeera, Time magazine, and others, so I think the article is worth the keep. NMasiha ( talk) 14:49, 15 August 2022 (UTC) reply
    WP:NCORP requires significant coverage in reliable sources. Mere mentions are not significant coverage about the organization. MarioGom ( talk) 16:16, 15 August 2022 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:20, 20 August 2022 (UTC) reply

  • Comment Their findings are certainly treated as reliable by many third parties, but there's very little coverage of them. I suspect that it may be that they don't talk about themselves to avoid reprisals, which may mean there are no sources to find. Not your siblings' deletionist ( talk) 21:45, 26 August 2022 (UTC) reply
  • Weak delete It seems that coverage should exist to meet WP:NORG, but alas I couldn't find much either. Please ping me if sources are found and I will happily change my !vote. MrsSnoozyTurtle 07:55, 28 August 2022 (UTC) reply
  • Delete unfortunately not a lot of coverage. KSAWikipedian ( talk) 11:14, 28 August 2022 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.