From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 07:41, 4 September 2016 (UTC) reply

Integrated Liberal Arts and Medicine

Integrated Liberal Arts and Medicine (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A curriculum is not an entity for which even turning it into a redirect to the University hosting it can be justified. Delete as a non-notable set of course requirements. KDS4444 ( talk) 23:12, 27 August 2016 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 00:44, 28 August 2016 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 00:44, 28 August 2016 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 00:44, 28 August 2016 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 00:44, 28 August 2016 (UTC) reply
  • delete - non-notable academic spam. Jytdog ( talk) 00:55, 28 August 2016 (UTC) reply
  • delete 2 gnews hits, it's not normal we outline academic programs on WP unless they meet WP:GNG. LibStar ( talk) 02:44, 1 September 2016 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.