The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. Speedy closed as a repost, and salted. As nominator , I completely failed to notice that it has already been deleted 4 times. I should have summarily deleted it instead of bringing it here. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง ( talk) 13:08, 30 July 2017 (UTC) reply

Infiniti Telecommunications (company)

Infiniti Telecommunications (company) (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

dePRODed by creator without addressing the issue(s). Concern was Non mainstream websites as sources, Press releases, and non notable awards. Nothing extraordinarily notable about this company. Articles looks as if it could just possibly be a 'get us on Wikipedia' exercise. COI and possible commissioned work. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง ( talk) 03:12, 30 July 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU ^(T) 05:48, 30 July 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU ^(T) 05:48, 30 July 2017 (UTC) reply

• Speedy Delete. Repost. duffbeerforme ( talk) 07:19, 30 July 2017 (UTC) reply
• Delete as per nom. Non-notable. A speedy delete may also be in order given repost. _pseudonym Jake Brockman ^talk 07:52, 30 July 2017 (UTC) reply
• Delete: Without being able to see the extent to which this is a repost of the version deleted via AfD in May, the industry awards claimed in this instance are not in themselves notable, and I am seeing nothing to overturn the recent AfD consensus by demonstrating that this company is of encyclopaedic notability whether by WP:CORPDEPTH or WP:GNG. AllyD ( talk) 11:40, 30 July 2017 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.